Skip to content
Cases

Almost nobody asks for what they need

Four questions per case: what was asked for, what was underneath, what got built and what changed. Each case says whose work it is, and none of them carries names or attributable figures.

On this page

01
The request, as it arrived
02
What was underneath
03
What got built
04
What changed

This firm is new and has no cases of its own yet. The ones below are the partners' earlier work, and each one says whose it is. They are told in as much detail as the confidentiality agreements allow: where a number is missing, it is because it cannot be published, not because it does not exist.

Ricardo Giorgis's track record, before the firm

“I just need a spreadsheet that works miracles”

The request, as it arrived

A spreadsheet that would pull together information from several departments and produce a monthly indicator. A week's work, according to the person who asked.

What was underneath

The information was not in several departments. It was in several versions of several files, and each department kept its own. The requested indicator was calculated differently in each version, so there was no single number to pull together. On top of that, part of what they wanted to measure was not being captured anywhere.

What got built

A full measurement system: structured capture at source, a data model with one definition per indicator, automated reporting on top, and, inside the same scope, the staff satisfaction instrument needed to close the indicator.

What changed

The report stopped depending on a person assembling it. The monthly discussion went from which file was right to what to do about the result.

The before and after of this case is the second demonstration piece. Open the demonstration

Ricardo Giorgis's track record, before the firm

From paper to screen

The request, as it arrived

An automated staff register for human resources, to serve as the basis for running a workplace climate survey on paper. Attendance, leave, hires and departures were kept on handwritten cards in filing cabinets.

What was underneath

There was not a single digital file. On the first visit, the person running human resources had a bag holding the whole staff's cards and was copying them out by hand into a text document. The problem was not a badly automated process. It had never been designed, it had no owner, and nothing they wanted to measure was being captured anywhere. And the complete staff record existed in one place, on paper, with no backup and no plan for the day it was lost.

What got built

Structured capture at source: hire and departure forms, and online leave requests, over a database holding the staff's demographic and employment information. Automated reporting with scheduled delivery on top. The climate survey was run over messaging instead of on paper, with questions written for the purpose: what had been asked for was a copy of the questionnaire and method of a well known proprietary instrument, and copying it was not an option. The intake form now prints the attendance card, so the paper that was genuinely needed comes out of the system instead of being written by hand.

What changed

The process was entirely manual and today it is semi-automated, which is as far as the scope went. You can see by department who is on the payroll and keep an attendance record that reconciles. An error that had been running for a while turned up, and the discussion stopped being about which card was right.

A whole register with no backup is what the continuity simulator puts numbers on. Open the demonstration